On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 18:48, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 05:39:58PM +0200, Loic Poulain wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 15:51, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 09:46:12PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > > > From: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Currently, the MHI controller driver defines which channels should > > > > have their inbound buffers allocated and queued. But ideally, this is > > > > something that should be decided by the MHI device driver instead, > > > > which actually deals with that buffers. > > > > > > > > Add a flag parameter to mhi_prepare_for_transfer allowing to specify > > > > if buffers have to be allocated and queued by the MHI stack. > > > > > > > > Keep auto_queue flag for now, but should be removed at some point. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Tested-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Hemant Kumar <hemantk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1621603519-16773-1-git-send-email-loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> > > [...] > > > > +/** > > > > + * enum mhi_chan_flags - MHI channel flags > > > > + * @MHI_CH_INBOUND_ALLOC_BUFS: Automatically allocate and queue inbound buffers > > > > + */ > > > > +enum mhi_chan_flags { > > > > + MHI_CH_INBOUND_ALLOC_BUFS = BIT(0), > > > > > > Why is an enumerated type a bitfield? > > > > > > Please just use integers for enumerated types. > > > > This 'trick' for listing flags is used in other places like drm, > > mac80211, etc...: grep -r "BIT(0)," ./include/ > > An enum is a list of values that are unique. Not values you can mush > together into a single variable and look at the bit masks of. > > > I don't understand why it would not be right? should we simply use > > a list of defines for this? > > What are you using this for? If you are going to combine them, then > yes, use #defines. Yes, it's for combining, thanks for the clarification. Loic
