Hi,
On 3/24/21 6:02 AM, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Hello Chanwoo, Greg,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 11:09 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Need to fix the work as following:
>> s/extconn/extcon
>>
>> And I'd like you to use the more correct patch title like the
>> following example:
>> "extcon: Use resource-managed function for delayed work"
>
> I think Greg merged this already. How should we handle this?
>
>> @@ -112,7 +113,9 @@ static int gpio_extcon_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&data->work, gpio_extcon_work);
>>> + ret = devm_delayed_work_autocancel(dev, &data->work,
>>> gpio_extcon_work);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>
>> Need to add the error log as following:
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize delayed_work");
>> return ret;
>> }
>
> I could send incremental patch to Greg for this but it does not change
> the commit message.
We cannot do anything about the commit message anymore, but the ordering
issue which you introduced really needs to be fixed.
Please send an incremental patch fixing the wrong order and the double
init of the workqueue.
Regards,
Hans
