Hi Rob, On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:44 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think that might not help if something fails to probe due to (for > example) a missing dependency, so !priv->kms is probably a better > check to cover both cases. But the 2nd patch makes a good point, that > the suspend/resume path probably needs the same treatment Thanks for the feedback. I will follow the same approach for fixing the suspend/resume path then. Let me test it and then I will re-submit Dmitry's patch and the one for suspend/resume as part of a patch series. Thanks
