Hi,
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 4:25 PM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > + mux {
> > >
> > > Rather than splitting the properties in {mux, cs, config} I think it
> > > makes more sense to split them in {spi, cs} or something like that.
> >
> > In general pinconf doesn't belong in the SoC dts file. If there's no
> > reason to change it seems like this should match what sc7180 did.
> >
>
> Right, but I still would prefer the pinctrl state to be split by
> function/pins, rather than pinmux vs pinconf. That way it's natural to
> add pinconf properties to the various functional parts (i.e. bias or
> drive-strength for the spi pins vs cs).
>
> Do you have any concerns with this?
I read this a few times and I'm not exactly sure what you're
proposing. Can you provide an example of what you want it to look
like in this case?
-Doug
