Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: qcom-hw: add missing devm_release_mem_region() call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 13 Jan 16:12 CST 2021, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:

> Il 13/01/21 06:06, Viresh Kumar ha scritto:
> > On 12-01-21, 22:59, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > But that said, why are the ioremap done at init and not at probe time?
> > 
> > These are some hardware registers per cpufreq policy I believe, and so
> > they did it from policy init instead.
> > 
> > And yes I agree that we shouldn't use devm_ from init() for the cases
> > where we need to put the resources in exit() as well. But things like
> > devm_kzalloc() are fine there.
> > 
> > Ionela, since you were the first one to post a patch about this, can
> > you send a fix for this by dropping the devm_ thing altogether for the
> > ioremap thing ? Mark it suggested by Bjorn. Thanks.
> > 
> 
> Sorry, are you sure that the eventual fix shouldn't be rebased on top of my
> change (12014503) [1] that is enabling CPU scaling for all of the platforms
> that aren't getting the OSM set-up entirely by the TZ/bootloader?
> It's a pretty big series, that I've rebased 3 times already...
> 

I hear you and I love the work you're doing, so I am definitely trying
to find time to review your patches properly.

Regarding the size of the series, my suggestion is that you have shown
the whole picture, so going forward it's better to split it up in
individual series based on how they will be merged by different
maintainers.

Thank you,
Bjorn

> [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20210112182052.481888-15-angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux