Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-12-10 10:22:38)
> I would repeat the same commit message that was in commit 5e4b7e82d497
> ("clk: qcom: gcc-sdm845: Use floor ops for sdcc clks") but it seems
> silly to do so when you could just go read that commit.
>
> NOTE: this is actually extra terrible because we're missing the 50 MHz
> rate in the table (see the next patch AKA ("clk: qcom: gcc-sc7180: Add
> 50 MHz clock rate for SDC2")). That means then when you run an older
> SD card it'll try to clock it at 100 MHz when it's only specced to run
> at 50 MHz max. As you can probably guess that doesn't work super
> well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 17269568f726 ("clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC) driver for SC7180")
> ---
> Taniya: can you please update whatever process is used to generate
> these clock files to use floor for SD card clocks. I hope you can
> also scour through these files looking for similar problems on other
> SoCs and submit patches for them.
Any chance the consumer of this clk can call clk_round_rate() and WARN()
if the rate is not anywhere near what it wants it to be? I fear that
this problem will just keep coming up otherwise.
