On Tue 08 Sep 02:57 CDT 2020, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> SM8250 SoC uses EPSS block for carrying out the cpufreq duties. Hence, add
> support for it in the driver with relevant of_match data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> index de816bcafd33..c3c397cc3dc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> @@ -285,8 +285,17 @@ static const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data qcom_soc_data = {
> .lut_row_size = 32,
> };
>
> +static const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data sm8250_soc_data = {
Could it be that this is the "epss_soc_data" (i.e. not sm8250 specific)?
(We should still use/include the platform specific compatible though).
Regards,
Bjorn
> + .reg_enable = 0x0,
> + .reg_freq_lut = 0x100,
> + .reg_volt_lut = 0x200,
> + .reg_perf_state = 0x320,
> + .lut_row_size = 4,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id qcom_cpufreq_hw_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,cpufreq-hw", .data = &qcom_soc_data },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-epss", .data = &sm8250_soc_data },
> {}
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_cpufreq_hw_match);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
