Hi, On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 5:53 PM kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Douglas, > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > [auto build test WARNING on pinctrl/devel] > [also build test WARNING on v5.8-rc4 next-20200708] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Douglas-Anderson/pinctrl-qcom-Handle-broken-PDC-dual-edge-case-on-sc7180/20200709-051816 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel > config: arm-defconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > >> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c:914:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > 914 | void msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > vim +/msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq +914 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c > > 913 > > 914 void msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) This is just because I'm missing a "static". For now I'll hold-off on reposting and wait for additional feedback. If I don't hear anything for a little while I'll re-post with this fix. -Doug
