Hi Douglas, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on pinctrl/devel] [also build test WARNING on v5.8-rc4 next-20200708] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Douglas-Anderson/pinctrl-qcom-Handle-broken-PDC-dual-edge-case-on-sc7180/20200709-051816 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel config: arm-defconfig (attached as .config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # save the attached .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c:914:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 914 | void msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq +914 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c 913 > 914 void msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) 915 { 916 struct irq_data *d = &desc->irq_data; 917 918 /* Make sure we're primed for the next edge */ 919 msm_gpio_update_dual_edge_parent(d); 920 921 /* Pass on to the normal interrupt handler */ 922 handle_fasteoi_irq(desc); 923 } 924 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
.config.gz
Description: application/gzip
