I have sent a v3. I tried to incorporate all of your remarks there. Thanks Robert On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:33 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 08:10:11PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio-ipq40xx.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-ipq40xx.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..d8c11c621f20 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-ipq40xx.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause > > +/* Copyright (c) 2015, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. */ > > +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Sartura Ltd. */ > > + > > +#include <linux/delay.h> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > +#include <linux/mutex.h> > > +#include <linux/io.h> > > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > > +#include <linux/of_mdio.h> > > +#include <linux/phy.h> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > > + > > Looking at how these registers are used, they could be renamed: > > > +#define MDIO_CTRL_0_REG 0x40 > > This seems to be unused. > > > +#define MDIO_CTRL_1_REG 0x44 > > MDIO_ADDR_REG > > > +#define MDIO_CTRL_2_REG 0x48 > > MDIO_DATA_WRITE_REG > > > +#define MDIO_CTRL_3_REG 0x4c > > MDIO_DATA_READ_REG > > > +#define MDIO_CTRL_4_REG 0x50 > > +#define MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_BUSY BIT(16) > > +#define MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_START BIT(8) > > +#define MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_CODE_READ 0 > > +#define MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_CODE_WRITE 1 > > MDIO_CMD_* ? > > > + > > +#define IPQ40XX_MDIO_RETRY 1000 > > +#define IPQ40XX_MDIO_DELAY 10 > > + > > +struct ipq40xx_mdio_data { > > + void __iomem *membase; > > +}; > > + > > +static int ipq40xx_mdio_wait_busy(struct mii_bus *bus) > > +{ > > + struct ipq40xx_mdio_data *priv = bus->priv; > > + int i; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < IPQ40XX_MDIO_RETRY; i++) { > > + unsigned int busy; > > + > > + busy = readl(priv->membase + MDIO_CTRL_4_REG) & > > + MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_BUSY; > > + if (!busy) > > + return 0; > > + > > + /* BUSY might take to be cleard by 15~20 times of loop */ > > + udelay(IPQ40XX_MDIO_DELAY); > > + } > > + > > + dev_err(bus->parent, "MDIO operation timed out\n"); > > + > > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > > +} > > + > > +static int ipq40xx_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int mii_id, int regnum) > > +{ > > + struct ipq40xx_mdio_data *priv = bus->priv; > > + int value = 0; > > + unsigned int cmd = 0; > > No need to initialise either of these, and you can eliminate "value" > which will then satisfy davem's requirement for reverse-christmas-tree > ordering of variable declarations. > > > + > > + /* Reject clause 45 */ > > + if (regnum & MII_ADDR_C45) > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > + > > + if (ipq40xx_mdio_wait_busy(bus)) > > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > > + > > + /* issue the phy address and reg */ > > + writel((mii_id << 8) | regnum, priv->membase + MDIO_CTRL_1_REG); > > + > > + cmd = MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_START | MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_CODE_READ; > > + > > + /* issue read command */ > > + writel(cmd, priv->membase + MDIO_CTRL_4_REG); > > + > > + /* Wait read complete */ > > + if (ipq40xx_mdio_wait_busy(bus)) > > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > > + > > + /* Read data */ > > + value = readl(priv->membase + MDIO_CTRL_3_REG); > > + > > + return value; > > +} > > + > > +static int ipq40xx_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int mii_id, int regnum, > > + u16 value) > > +{ > > + struct ipq40xx_mdio_data *priv = bus->priv; > > + unsigned int cmd = 0; > > No need to initialise cmd. > > -- > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up