Hi Elliot,
I have dropped the wrong mailing list you had used. The right one is
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. I won't add now as it makes no
sense to just have the response there without the patch.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 03:28:04PM -0800, Elliot Berman wrote:
> Some implementors of PSCI may relax the requirements of the PSCI
> architectural warm reset. In order to comply with PSCI specification, a
> different reset_type value must be used. The alternate PSCI
> SYSTEM_RESET2 may be used in all warm/soft reboot scenarios, replacing
> the architectural warm reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <eberman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/psci.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/psci.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/psci.h b/include/linux/psci.h
> index a67712b..1959a80 100644
> --- a/include/linux/psci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/psci.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct psci_operations {
> int (*migrate_info_type)(void);
> enum arm_smccc_conduit conduit;
> enum smccc_version smccc_version;
> + u32 sys_reset2_reset_type;
Why this needs to be in this header ? Can't it be just local to psci.c ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
