On Wed 18 Dec 14:35 PST 2019, Douglas Anderson wrote: > When we iterate over ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut, there's no reason to > start at index 0 which always contains the value 0. 0 is not a valid > link rate. > > This change should have no real effect but is a small cleanup. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Changes in v3: None > Changes in v2: None > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c > index 2fb9370a76e6..7b596af265e4 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c > @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dp_rate(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) > /* set DP data rate */ > dp_rate_mhz = ((bit_rate_mhz / pdata->dsi->lanes) * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM) / > DP_CLK_FUDGE_DEN; > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1; i++) > + for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1; i++) > if (ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[i] > dp_rate_mhz) > break; > > -- > 2.24.1.735.g03f4e72817-goog >
