When we iterate over ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut, there's no reason to start at index 0 which always contains the value 0. 0 is not a valid link rate. This change should have no real effect but is a small cleanup. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c index 2fb9370a76e6..7b596af265e4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dp_rate(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) /* set DP data rate */ dp_rate_mhz = ((bit_rate_mhz / pdata->dsi->lanes) * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM) / DP_CLK_FUDGE_DEN; - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1; i++) + for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1; i++) if (ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[i] > dp_rate_mhz) break; -- 2.24.1.735.g03f4e72817-goog
