On 09/09/19 03:21:16, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz (2019-08-26 09:45:07) > > @@ -76,10 +88,11 @@ static int qcom_apcs_msm8916_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > a53cc->src_shift = 8; > > a53cc->parent_map = gpll0_a53cc_map; > > > > - a53cc->pclk = devm_clk_get(parent, NULL); > > + a53cc->pclk = of_clk_get(parent->of_node, pll_index); > > Presumably the PLL was always index 0, so why are we changing it to > index 1 sometimes? Seems unnecessary. > it came as a personal preference. hope it is acceptable (I would rather not change it) apcs-msm8916.c declares the following [..] static const u32 gpll0_a53cc_map[] = { 4, 5 }; static const char *gpll0_a53cc[] = { "gpll0_vote", "a53pll", }; [..] now will be doing this --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi @@ -429,7 +429,8 @@ compatible = "qcom,msm8916-apcs-kpss-global", "syscon"; reg = <0xb011000 0x1000>; #mbox-cells = <1>; - clocks = <&a53pll>; + clocks = <&gcc GPLL0_VOTE>, <&a53pll>; + clock-names = "aux", "pll"; #clock-cells = <0>; }; so I chose to keep the consistency between the clocks definition and just change the index before calling of_clk_get.