On Tue, 04 Jun 2019, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 04 Jun 03:44 PDT 2019, Lee Jones wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
> [..]
> > @@ -373,7 +416,7 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_clk_init(struct dwc3_qcom *qcom, int count)
> >
> > qcom->num_clocks = count;
> >
> > - if (!count)
> > + if (!count || ACPI_HANDLE(dev))
> > return 0;
>
> Afaict you call this with count = of_count_phandle_with_args(), which
> should be 0. But why not skip calling this at all?
Actually count can be <0, which is why I must have needed it at the
beginning. There is another patch in this set which checks for
errors, thus the ACPI_HANDLE() call should now be superfluous. I
will test and remove it.
> > qcom->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, qcom->num_clocks,
> > @@ -409,12 +452,28 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_clk_init(struct dwc3_qcom *qcom, int count)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static const struct dwc3_acpi_pdata sdm845_acpi_pdata = {
> > + .qscratch_base_offset = SDM845_QSCRATCH_BASE_OFFSET,
> > + .qscratch_base_size = SDM845_QSCRATCH_SIZE,
> > + .dwc3_core_base_size = SDM845_DWC3_CORE_SIZE,
> > + .hs_phy_irq_index = 1,
> > + .dp_hs_phy_irq_index = 4,
> > + .dm_hs_phy_irq_index = 3,
> > + .ss_phy_irq_index = 2
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct acpi_device_id dwc3_qcom_acpi_match[] = {
> > + { "QCOM2430", (unsigned long)&sdm845_acpi_pdata },
> > + { },
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dwc3_qcom_acpi_match);
>
> Analog to of_device_get_match_data() there seems to be a
> acpi_device_get_match_data(), if you use this you should be able to
> have you acpi_device_id array next to the of_device_id.
Do you mean "Analogous"?
I will try to group them, thanks.
> > +
> > static int dwc3_qcom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> It seems that all that's left unconditional on ACPI_HANDLE() in this
> function are the optional pieces and the tail. Wouldn't it be cleaner to
> split it out in different functions?
There are ~50 lines of shared code in dwc3_qcom_probe(), most of it is
interspersed between the configuration table (DT, ACPI) pieces, which
is why it's formatted in the current way.
I can split a few things out into separate functions if you think
it'll help.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
