On Tue 04 Jun 03:44 PDT 2019, Lee Jones wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
[..]
> @@ -373,7 +416,7 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_clk_init(struct dwc3_qcom *qcom, int count)
>
> qcom->num_clocks = count;
>
> - if (!count)
> + if (!count || ACPI_HANDLE(dev))
> return 0;
Afaict you call this with count = of_count_phandle_with_args(), which
should be 0. But why not skip calling this at all?
>
> qcom->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, qcom->num_clocks,
> @@ -409,12 +452,28 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_clk_init(struct dwc3_qcom *qcom, int count)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const struct dwc3_acpi_pdata sdm845_acpi_pdata = {
> + .qscratch_base_offset = SDM845_QSCRATCH_BASE_OFFSET,
> + .qscratch_base_size = SDM845_QSCRATCH_SIZE,
> + .dwc3_core_base_size = SDM845_DWC3_CORE_SIZE,
> + .hs_phy_irq_index = 1,
> + .dp_hs_phy_irq_index = 4,
> + .dm_hs_phy_irq_index = 3,
> + .ss_phy_irq_index = 2
> +};
> +
> +static const struct acpi_device_id dwc3_qcom_acpi_match[] = {
> + { "QCOM2430", (unsigned long)&sdm845_acpi_pdata },
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dwc3_qcom_acpi_match);
Analog to of_device_get_match_data() there seems to be a
acpi_device_get_match_data(), if you use this you should be able to
have you acpi_device_id array next to the of_device_id.
> +
> static int dwc3_qcom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
It seems that all that's left unconditional on ACPI_HANDLE() in this
function are the optional pieces and the tail. Wouldn't it be cleaner to
split it out in different functions?
Regards,
Bjorn
