On 10/01/2019 05:02, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Rajendra Nayak (9): > dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-level bindings > OPP: Add support for parsing the 'opp-level' property > dt-bindings: power: Add qcom rpm power domain driver bindings > soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add a Power domain driver to model corners > soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support for get/set performance state > arm64: dts: msm8996: Add rpmpd device node > soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Add RPMh power domain driver > arm64: dts: sdm845: Add rpmh powercontroller node > soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Mark mx as a parent for cx > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt | 3 + > .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt | 145 +++++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 34 ++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 51 +++ Whenever I see these patches adding support for msm8996 (aka sdm820) and sdm845 simultaneously, I think to myself: "Why is sdm835 being left out? It was released between sdm820 and sdm845, it cannot be /that/ different." So I'm wondering: how much extra work would it be to add support for msm8998 aka sdm835? Regards.
