On 15-01-19, 21:52, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Wed 09 Jan 22:33 PST 2019, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > +Rafael > > > > On 10-01-19, 09:32, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > Changes in v11: > > > * Updated opp-level binding description based on feedback > > > from Viresh > > > * Other minor fixups in 'PATCH 2/9' > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt | 3 + > > > .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt | 145 +++++++ > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 34 ++ > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 51 +++ > > > drivers/opp/core.c | 18 + > > > drivers/opp/of.c | 2 + > > > drivers/opp/opp.h | 2 + > > > drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 18 + > > > drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 2 + > > > drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 402 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 317 ++++++++++++++ > > > include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 39 ++ > > > include/linux/pm_opp.h | 7 + > > > 13 files changed, 1040 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt > > > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c > > > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c > > > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h > > > > Rafael/Ulf: Who should pick this series ? Should I take this via OPP > > tree ? > > > > Given that the weight of the patches lies in arm-soc area it could be > favourable to just take them that way, with the one opp-patch carrying > your (Rafael's?) ack. > > If you prefer otherwise, I suggest that we take patch 6 and 8 (the two > dts patches) through arm-soc and you merge the rest in your tree. Okay, take it via arm-soc. I will ask for a branch later on if I find more patches going for the OPP core this cycle. -- viresh
