Hi Marc,
On 2018-12-07 14:18, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
On 06/12/2018 17:58, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Tue 20 Nov 13:08 PST 2018, Sibi Sankar wrote:
Add power-domain bindings for Q6V5 MSS on SDM845 SoCs.
Thanks Sibi,
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Add dt-binding corresponding to
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10586893/
(remoteproc: q6v5: Add support to vote for rpmh power domains)
.../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt | 11
+++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt
index 14947562bc67..bd9f4882fcf0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt
@@ -75,6 +75,17 @@ on the Qualcomm Hexagon core.
Definition: reference to the regulators to be held on behalf of the
booting of the Hexagon core
+- power-domains:
+ Usage: required
+ Value type: <phandle>
+ Definition: reference to the cx, mx and mss power-domains to be
held on
+ behalf of the booting the Hexagon core
This should mention that these are the domains for SDM845, as the list
seems to differ somewhat between platforms. Please also define the
requirements for MSM8996 (cx & mx) here, while you're at it.
Yeah, and let's not forget MSM8998/SDM835, because it wouldn't be fair
that only the other SoCs get all the love! ^_^
Q6V5 MSS does not currently support MSM8998 MSS. I had a
quick look at the CAF branch seems like with minor changes
we can have it working since the delta from 8996 appears
minimal. I'll give it a try once I get my hands on a 8998
MTP.
Regards.
--
-- Sibi Sankar --
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
