Re: WIP: UFS on apq8098

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/3/2018 8:27 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
On 12/3/2018 8:18 AM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
Hello,

I'm trying to enable UFS on apq8098. Just wanted to share my progress
so far, in case someone spots any glaring mistakes.

Excellent.  This was down on my todo list.  I'm glad its getting some attention.


(WIP patch provided at message's end.)

rpm_smd_clk_probe() runs successfully, and returns 0.

qcom_qmp_phy_probe() fails:

[    0.913707] qcom-qmp-phy 1da7000.phy: Failed to get clk 'ref': -2
[    0.913761] qcom-qmp-phy: probe of 1da7000.phy failed with error -2

ufs_qcom_probe() also fails (which may be caused by PHY failure)

[    2.368486] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_get_vreg: vdd-hba get failed, err=-517
[    2.370673] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: Initialization failed
[    2.412908] ufshcd-qcom 1da4000.ufshc: ufshcd_pltfrm_init() failed -517

I'll investigate the PHY init.

Regards.


diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi
index b4276da1fb0d..ad7542f461af 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi
@@ -241,3 +241,26 @@
          };
      };
  };
+
+&ufshc {
+    status = "ok";
+    vdd-hba-supply = <&gcc UFS_GDSC>;
+    vdd-hba-fixed-regulator;
+    vcc-supply = <&vreg_l20a_2p95>;
+    vccq-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
+    vccq2-supply = <&vreg_s4a_1p8>;
+    vcc-max-microamp = <750000>;
+    vccq-max-microamp = <560000>;
+    vccq2-max-microamp = <750000>;
+};
+
+&ufsphy {
+    status = "ok";
+    vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l1a_0p875>;
+    vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l2a_1p2>;
+    vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
+    vdda-phy-max-microamp = <51400>;
+    vdda-pll-max-microamp = <14600>;
+    vddp-ref-clk-max-microamp = <100>;
+    vddp-ref-clk-always-on;
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
index d291b4713c33..10e7b8a55b8a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
@@ -264,6 +264,11 @@
          rpm_requests: rpm-requests {
              compatible = "qcom,rpm-msm8998";
              qcom,glink-channels = "rpm_requests";
+
+            rpmcc: qcom,rpmcc {
+                compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8998";
+                #clock-cells = <1>;
+            };
          };
      };
@@ -686,5 +691,79 @@
              redistributor-stride = <0x0 0x20000>;
              interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
          };
+
+        ufshc: ufshc@1da4000 {
+            compatible = "qcom,msm8998-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc",
+                     "jedec,ufs-2.0";
+            reg = <0x1da4000 0x2500>;
+            interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+            phys = <&ufsphy_lanes>;
+            phy-names = "ufsphy";
+            lanes-per-direction = <2>;
+            power-domains = <&gcc UFS_GDSC>;
+
+            clock-names =
+                "core_clk",
+                "bus_aggr_clk",
+                "iface_clk",
+                "core_clk_unipro",
+                "core_clk_ice",
+                "ref_clk",
+                "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
+                "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
+                "rx_lane1_sync_clk";
+            clocks =
+                <&gcc GCC_UFS_AXI_CLK>,
+                <&gcc GCC_AGGRE1_UFS_AXI_CLK>,
+                <&gcc GCC_UFS_AHB_CLK>,
+                <&gcc GCC_UFS_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
+                <&gcc GCC_UFS_ICE_CORE_CLK>,
+                <&rpmcc 0>,
+                <&gcc GCC_UFS_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
+                <&gcc GCC_UFS_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
+                <&gcc GCC_UFS_RX_SYMBOL_1_CLK>;
+            freq-table-hz =
+                <50000000 200000000>,
+                <0 0>,
+                <0 0>,
+                <37500000 150000000>,
+                <75000000 300000000>,
+                <0 0>,
+                <0 0>,
+                <0 0>,
+                <0 0>;
+
+            resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_BCR>;

I dunno how much this factors into your issues, but the resets defined in gcc-msm8998.c are wrong.  I'm posting a patch later today.  I know this was a problem for me with USB.

+            reset-names = "rst";
+
+            status = "disabled";
+        };
+
+        ufsphy: phy@1da7000 {
+            compatible = "qcom,sdm845-qmp-ufs-phy";
+            reg = <0x1da7000 0x18c>;
+            #address-cells = <1>;
+            #size-cells = <1>;
+            ranges;
+            clock-names =
+                "ref_clk_src",
+                "ref_clk",
+                "ref_aux_clk";
+            clocks =
+                <&rpmcc 0>,
+                <&gcc GCC_UFS_CLKREF_CLK>,

Also, "GCC_UFS_CLKREF_CLK" is not defined in include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-msm8998.h which is probably the cause of your -2 error listed above.

+                <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
+
+            status = "disabled";
+
+            ufsphy_lanes: lanes@1da7400 {
+                reg = <0x1da7400 0x108>,
+                      <0x1da7600 0x1e0>,
+                      <0x1da7c00 0x1dc>,
+                      <0x1da7800 0x108>,
+                      <0x1da7a00 0x1e0>;
+                #phy-cells = <0>;
+            };
+        };
      };
  };
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
index 850c02a52248..12a0a2d6ec7b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
@@ -611,10 +611,25 @@ static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_msm8996 = {
      .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_clks),
  };
+/* msm8998 */
+#define LN_BB_CLK1_ID 0x1
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8998, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_a_clk1, LN_BB_CLK1_ID);
+
+static struct clk_smd_rpm *msm8998_clks[] = {
+    [0] = &msm8998_ln_bb_clk1,
+    [1] = &msm8998_ln_bb_a_clk1,
+};
+
+static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_msm8998 = {
+    .clks = msm8998_clks,
+    .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8998_clks),
+};
+
  static const struct of_device_id rpm_smd_clk_match_table[] = {
      { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8916", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8916 },
      { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8974", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8974 },
      { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8996", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8996 },
+    { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8998", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8998 },
      { }
  };
  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpm_smd_clk_match_table);





--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux