On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 07:07:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [...] > > > I don't see any dependency there, so I'll queue up the 1-3 in > > > pm-domains and the 4-6 in pm-cpuidle. > > > > I do not see why we should merge patches 4-6 for v4.20; they add legacy > > (DT bindings and related parsing code) with no user in the kernel; we > > may still want to tweak them, in particular PSCI DT bindings. > > My impression was that 4-6 have been agreed on due to the ACKs they > carry. I'll drop them if that's not the case. I have not expressed myself correctly: they have been agreed (even though as I said they may require some tweaking) but I see no urgency of merging them in v4.20 since they have no user. They contain DT bindings, that create ABI/legacy, I think it is better to have code that uses them in the kernel before merging them and creating a dependency that is not needed. > > Likewise, it makes no sense to merge patches 7-8 without the rest of > > the PSCI patches. > > OK > > I'll let the ARM camp sort out the PSCI material then. We will do. Thanks, Lorenzo
