On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat >> with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I >> have a plan for how to move forward. >> >> However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided >> to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete >> series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes, >> which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily. >> >> My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's >> late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8. > > I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I > can apply them right away. Do you want me to do that? Yes, please. > > As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the > PSCI-related ones need ACKs. For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more. Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed. Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack from Daniel) Patch 7 and 8 should be fine. They were suggested by Mark. Patch 9 and 10 needs acks. Patch 11 has been acked, but depends on the other PSCI changes. Kind regards Uffe
