On 4 October 2018 at 11:32, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:04 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thursday, October 4, 2018 10:58:53 AM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote: >> > On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat >> > >> with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I >> > >> have a plan for how to move forward. >> > >> >> > >> However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided >> > >> to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete >> > >> series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes, >> > >> which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily. >> > >> >> > >> My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's >> > >> late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8. >> > > >> > > I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I >> > > can apply them right away. Do you want me to do that? >> > >> > Yes, please. >> > >> > > >> > > As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the >> > > PSCI-related ones need ACKs. >> > >> > For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more. >> > >> > Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed. >> > >> > Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack >> > from Daniel) >> >> OK, thanks. >> >> Do the 4-6 depend on the 1-3? > > I don't see any dependency there, so I'll queue up the 1-3 in > pm-domains and the 4-6 in pm-cpuidle. Great, thanks! Make sure you put the remaining of the PSCI changes on pm-cpuidle (once acked), as there are dependency. Kind regards Uffe
