On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 5:00 AM Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 06:02:39PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > The SROT registers are initialised by the secure firmware at boot. We
> > don't have write access to the registers. Check if the block is enabled
> > before continuing.
> >
>
> Should this be merged to patch 6?
I've kept it separate because this 'enable' check could've been added
to the old code as well, without the separate SROT mapping in patch 6.
So in my mind, they're two different things: splitting the address map
and adding the 'enable' check and I'd prefer to keep it as it is.
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > index 0b8a793f15f4..d250b757d1f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,11 @@
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > #include "tsens.h"
> >
> > +/* SROT */
> > +#define CTRL_OFFSET 0x4
> > +#define TSENS_EN BIT(0)
> > +
> > +/* TM */
> > #define STATUS_OFFSET 0x30
> > #define SN_ADDR_OFFSET 0x4
> > #define SN_ST_TEMP_MASK 0x3ff
> > @@ -119,6 +124,8 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_device *tmdev)
> > {
> > void __iomem *tm_base, *srot_base;
> > struct resource *res;
> > + u32 code;
> > + int ret;
> > struct platform_device *op = of_find_device_by_node(tmdev->dev->of_node);
> >
> > if (!op)
> > @@ -151,5 +158,15 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_device *tmdev)
> > if (IS_ERR(tmdev->tm_map))
> > return PTR_ERR(tmdev->tm_map);
> >
> > + if (tmdev->srot_map) {
> > + ret = regmap_read(tmdev->srot_map, CTRL_OFFSET, &code);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + if (!(code & TSENS_EN)) {
> > + dev_err(tmdev->dev, "tsens device is not enabled\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
