On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] > >>> >>> Assuming that I have got that right, there are concerns, mostly regarding >>> patch [07/26], but I will reply to that directly. >> >> Well, I haven't got that right, so never mind. >> >> There are a few minor things to address, but apart from that the general >> genpd patches look ready. > > Alright, thanks! > > I will re-spin the series and post a new version once 4.19 rc1 is out. > Hopefully we can queue it up early in next cycle to get it tested in > next for a while. > >> >>> The $subject patch is fine by me by itself, but it obviously depends on the >>> previous ones. Patches [01-02/26] are fine too, but they don't seem to be >>> particularly useful without the rest of the series. >>> >>> As far as patches [10-26/26] go, I'd like to see some review comments and/or >>> tags from the people with vested interest in there, in particular from Daniel >>> on patch [12/26] and from Sudeep on the PSCI ones. >> >> But this still holds. > > Actually, patch 10 and patch11 is ready to go as well. I ping Daniel > on patch 12. > > In regards to the rest of the series, some of the PSCI/ARM changes > have been reviewed by Mark Rutland, however several changes have not > been acked. > > On the other hand, one can also interpret the long silence in regards > to PSCI/ARM changes as they are good to go. :-) Well, in that case giving an ACK to them should not be an issue for the people with a vested interest I suppose. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
