[...] >> >> Assuming that I have got that right, there are concerns, mostly regarding >> patch [07/26], but I will reply to that directly. > > Well, I haven't got that right, so never mind. > > There are a few minor things to address, but apart from that the general > genpd patches look ready. Alright, thanks! I will re-spin the series and post a new version once 4.19 rc1 is out. Hopefully we can queue it up early in next cycle to get it tested in next for a while. > >> The $subject patch is fine by me by itself, but it obviously depends on the >> previous ones. Patches [01-02/26] are fine too, but they don't seem to be >> particularly useful without the rest of the series. >> >> As far as patches [10-26/26] go, I'd like to see some review comments and/or >> tags from the people with vested interest in there, in particular from Daniel >> on patch [12/26] and from Sudeep on the PSCI ones. > > But this still holds. Actually, patch 10 and patch11 is ready to go as well. I ping Daniel on patch 12. In regards to the rest of the series, some of the PSCI/ARM changes have been reviewed by Mark Rutland, however several changes have not been acked. On the other hand, one can also interpret the long silence in regards to PSCI/ARM changes as they are good to go. :-) Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
