On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 04:16:05PM +0530, Vijay Viswanath wrote: > The load a particular sdhc controller should request from a regulator > is device specific and hence each device should individually vote for > the required load. "dt-bindings: mmc: ..." for the subject. > > Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt > index 502b3b8..ee34f28 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt > @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ Required properties: > "cal" - reference clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional) > "sleep" - sleep clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional) > > +Optional properties: > +- <supply>-current-level - specifies load levels for supply during BUS_ON > + and BUS_OFF states in power irq. Should be specified in > + pairs (lpm, hpm), for BUS_OFF and BUS_ON respectively. > + Units uA. This should probably be a common regulator property (or maybe one exists already). It is missing vendor prefix and unit suffix as-is. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
