On 2018-07-19 03:12, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Abhishek,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Wed, 18 Jul 2018
23:41:44 +0200:
Hi Boris,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Wed, 18 Jul
2018
23:36:37 +0200:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:15:26 +0200
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi Abhishek,
> >
> > Abhishek Sahu <absahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Fri, 6 Jul 2018
> > 13:21:58 +0530:
> >
> > > Remove the NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN to use RAM based BBT.
> >
> > Unless I am understanding it the wrong way, NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN will skip
> > the scan of the on-chip BBT and will scan every block to construct a
> > RAM, based BBT thanks to the BBM.
> >
> > So flash based BBT is already unused and removing this flag is a
> > mistake, right?
>
> ->scan_bbt() is also taking care of building the in-RAM BBT based on
> BBM when no on-flash BBT is provided, so I think it's the right thing
> to do.
Oh right. Then doing so is harmless.
Could you please update the commit log to reflect this aspect?
Thanks Miquel and Boris.
I will update the commit log.
Regards,
Abhishek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
