On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:15:26 +0200 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > Abhishek Sahu <absahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Fri, 6 Jul 2018 > 13:21:58 +0530: > > > Remove the NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN to use RAM based BBT. > > Unless I am understanding it the wrong way, NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN will skip > the scan of the on-chip BBT and will scan every block to construct a > RAM, based BBT thanks to the BBM. > > So flash based BBT is already unused and removing this flag is a > mistake, right? ->scan_bbt() is also taking care of building the in-RAM BBT based on BBM when no on-flash BBT is provided, so I think it's the right thing to do. > > > Flash based BBT is not used since bootloaders > > doesn't have support for the same. > > > > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Thanks, > Miquèl > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
