Hi Balakrishna,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 01:19:00AM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 2018-06-19 12:41, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
> > HI Matthias,
> >
> > Please find my comments in line.
> >
> > On 2018-06-19 03:21, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 11:57:15AM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi
> > > wrote:
> > > > Subject: Bluetooth: hci_qca: Defined wrapper functions for setting
> > > > UART speeds
> > >
> > > s/Defined/Define/
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > s/Defined/Add/
> > >
> > [Bala]: will update the text.
> > > >
> > > > In qca_setup, we set initial and operating speeds for Qualcomm
> > > > Bluetooth SoC's. This block of code is common across different
> > > > Qualcomm Bluetooth SoC's. Instead of duplicating the code, created
> > > > a wrapper function to set the speeds. So that future coming SoC's
> > > > can use these wrapper functions to set speeds.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v7:
> > > > * initial patch
> > > > * created wrapper functions for init and operating speeds.
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 64
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > > > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> > > > b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> > > > index fe62420ef838..3e09c6223baf 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> > > > @@ -923,21 +923,10 @@ static inline void
> > > > host_set_baudrate(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned int speed)
> > > > hci_uart_set_baudrate(hu, speed);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
> > > > +static void qca_set_init_speed(struct hci_uart *hu)
> > > > {
> > > > - struct hci_dev *hdev = hu->hdev;
> > > > - struct qca_data *qca = hu->priv;
> > > > - unsigned int speed, qca_baudrate = QCA_BAUDRATE_115200;
> > > > - int ret;
> > > > - int soc_ver = 0;
> > > > -
> > > > - bt_dev_info(hdev, "ROME setup");
> > > > -
> > > > - /* Patch downloading has to be done without IBS mode */
> > > > - clear_bit(STATE_IN_BAND_SLEEP_ENABLED, &qca->flags);
> > > > + unsigned int speed = 0;
> > > >
> > > > - /* Setup initial baudrate */
> > > > - speed = 0;
> > > > if (hu->init_speed)
> > > > speed = hu->init_speed;
> > > > else if (hu->proto->init_speed)
> > > > @@ -945,27 +934,64 @@ static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
> > > >
> > > > if (speed)
> > > > host_set_baudrate(hu, speed);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int qca_get_oper_speed(struct hci_uart *hu)
> > >
> > > Return type should be unsigned int.
> > >
> > [Bala]: will update
> > > > +{
> > > > + unsigned int speed = 0;
> > > >
> > > > - /* Setup user speed if needed */
> > > > - speed = 0;
> > > > if (hu->oper_speed)
> > > > speed = hu->oper_speed;
> > > > else if (hu->proto->oper_speed)
> > > > speed = hu->proto->oper_speed;
> > > >
> > > > + return speed;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int qca_set_oper_speed(struct hci_uart *hu)
> > > > +{
> > > > + unsigned int speed = 0, qca_baudrate;
> > >
> > > initialization is not needed.
> > >
> > [Bala]: will update
> >
> > > > + int ret = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + speed = qca_get_oper_speed(hu);
> > > > if (speed) {
> > >
> > > nit:
> > > if (!speed)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > >
> > [Bala]: will update.
> >
> > > > qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
> > > > -
> > > > - bt_dev_info(hdev, "Set UART speed to %d", speed);
> > > > - ret = qca_set_baudrate(hdev, qca_baudrate);
> > > > + bt_dev_info(hu->hdev, "Set UART speed to %d", speed);
> > > > + ret = qca_set_baudrate(hu->hdev, qca_baudrate);
> > > > if (ret) {
> > > > - bt_dev_err(hdev, "Failed to change the baud rate (%d)",
> > > > + bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to change the baud rate (%d)",
> > > > ret);
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > > host_set_baudrate(hu, speed);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct hci_dev *hdev = hu->hdev;
> > > > + struct qca_data *qca = hu->priv;
> > > > + unsigned int speed, qca_baudrate = QCA_BAUDRATE_115200;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > + int soc_ver = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + bt_dev_info(hdev, "ROME setup");
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Patch downloading has to be done without IBS mode */
> > > > + clear_bit(STATE_IN_BAND_SLEEP_ENABLED, &qca->flags);
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Setup initial baudrate */
> > > > + qca_set_init_speed(hu);
> > > > + /* Setup user speed if needed */
> > > > + ret = qca_set_oper_speed(hu);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + speed = qca_get_oper_speed(hu);
> > > > + if (speed)
> > > > + qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
> > >
> > > nit: the sequence
> > >
> > > qca_set_oper_speed()
> > > qca_get_oper_speed()
> > >
> > > is slightly awkward to read. This could be avoided if the speed was
> > > passed as parameter, though I understand this isn't done for symmetry
> > > with qca_set_init_speed(). An alternative could be:
> > >
> > > static int qca_set_speed(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned int speed, enum
> > > qca_speed_type speed_type)
> > > {
> > > unsigned int qca_baudrate;
> > >
> > > if (speed_type == QCA_OPER_SPEED) {
> > > qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
> > > bt_dev_info(hu->hdev, "Set UART speed to %d", speed);
> > > ret = qca_set_baudrate(hu->hdev, qca_baudrate);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to change the baud rate (%d)",
> > > ret);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > host_set_baudrate(hu, speed);
> > >
> > > /* If the order doesn't matter set the host baudrate first and
> > > return if speed_type != QCA_OPER_SPEED */
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
> > > {
> > > ...
> > > speed = qca_get_init_speed(hu);
> > > if (speed)
> > > qca_set_speed(hu, speed, QCA_INIT_SPEED);
> > >
> > > speed = qca_get_oper_speed(hu);
> > > if (speed) {
> > > qca_set_speed(hu, speed, QCA_OPER_SPEED);
> > > qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
> > > }
> > > ...
> > > }
> > >
> > > Just a suggestion, ok for me if you prefer to keep it as is.
> >
> > [Bala]: will study and update the same.
>
> [Bala]: you are suggestion looks ok to me. i am thinking to optimize
> further.
>
> static unsigned int qca_get_speed(struct hci_uart *hu,
> enum qca_speed_type speed_type)
> {
> unsigned int speed = 0;
>
> if (speed_type == QCA_INIT_SPEED) {
> if (hu->init_speed)
> speed = hu->init_speed;
> else if (hu->proto->init_speed)
> speed = hu->proto->init_speed;
> } else {
> if (hu->oper_speed)
> speed = hu->oper_speed;
> else if (hu->proto->oper_speed)
> speed = hu->proto->oper_speed;
> }
>
> return speed;
> }
>
> static int qca_set_speed(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned int speed,
> enum qca_speed_type speed_type)
> {
> unsigned int qca_baudrate;
> int ret;
>
> if (speed_type == QCA_OPER_SPEED) {
> qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
> bt_dev_info(hu->hdev, "Set UART speed to %d", speed);
> ret = qca_set_baudrate(hu->hdev, qca_baudrate);
> if (ret) {
> bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to change the baudrate
> (%d)",
> ret);
> return ret;
> }
> }
>
> host_set_baudrate(hu, speed);
nit: if the order doesn't matter consider setting the host baudrate
first and return if 'speed_type != QCA_OPER_SPEED', which reduces the
indentiation (just a minor not really important thing though).
I also see a point in not setting the host baudrate if the chip
baudrate couldn't be set, so whatever ;-)
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
> {
> ...
> /* Setup initial baudrate */
> speed = qca_get_speed(hu, QCA_INIT_SPEED);
> if (speed)
> qca_set_speed(hu, speed, QCA_INIT_SPEED);
>
> /* Setup user speed if needed */
> speed = qca_get_speed(hu, QCA_OPER_SPEED);
> if (speed) {
> ret = qca_set_speed(hu, speed, QCA_OPER_SPEED);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
> }
>
> }
>
> will have two functions,
> qca_set_speed(): for setting speed
> qca_get_speed(): to get the speed.
>
> is this preferable?
Looks good to me, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
