Hi Matthias,
On 2018-06-19 12:41, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
HI Matthias,
Please find my comments in line.
On 2018-06-19 03:21, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 11:57:15AM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi
wrote:
Subject: Bluetooth: hci_qca: Defined wrapper functions for setting
UART speeds
s/Defined/Define/
or
s/Defined/Add/
[Bala]: will update the text.
In qca_setup, we set initial and operating speeds for Qualcomm
Bluetooth SoC's. This block of code is common across different
Qualcomm Bluetooth SoC's. Instead of duplicating the code, created
a wrapper function to set the speeds. So that future coming SoC's
can use these wrapper functions to set speeds.
Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v7:
* initial patch
* created wrapper functions for init and operating speeds.
---
drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 64
++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
index fe62420ef838..3e09c6223baf 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
@@ -923,21 +923,10 @@ static inline void host_set_baudrate(struct
hci_uart *hu, unsigned int speed)
hci_uart_set_baudrate(hu, speed);
}
-static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
+static void qca_set_init_speed(struct hci_uart *hu)
{
- struct hci_dev *hdev = hu->hdev;
- struct qca_data *qca = hu->priv;
- unsigned int speed, qca_baudrate = QCA_BAUDRATE_115200;
- int ret;
- int soc_ver = 0;
-
- bt_dev_info(hdev, "ROME setup");
-
- /* Patch downloading has to be done without IBS mode */
- clear_bit(STATE_IN_BAND_SLEEP_ENABLED, &qca->flags);
+ unsigned int speed = 0;
- /* Setup initial baudrate */
- speed = 0;
if (hu->init_speed)
speed = hu->init_speed;
else if (hu->proto->init_speed)
@@ -945,27 +934,64 @@ static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
if (speed)
host_set_baudrate(hu, speed);
+}
+
+static int qca_get_oper_speed(struct hci_uart *hu)
Return type should be unsigned int.
[Bala]: will update
+{
+ unsigned int speed = 0;
- /* Setup user speed if needed */
- speed = 0;
if (hu->oper_speed)
speed = hu->oper_speed;
else if (hu->proto->oper_speed)
speed = hu->proto->oper_speed;
+ return speed;
+}
+
+static int qca_set_oper_speed(struct hci_uart *hu)
+{
+ unsigned int speed = 0, qca_baudrate;
initialization is not needed.
[Bala]: will update
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ speed = qca_get_oper_speed(hu);
if (speed) {
nit:
if (!speed)
return 0;
[Bala]: will update.
qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
-
- bt_dev_info(hdev, "Set UART speed to %d", speed);
- ret = qca_set_baudrate(hdev, qca_baudrate);
+ bt_dev_info(hu->hdev, "Set UART speed to %d", speed);
+ ret = qca_set_baudrate(hu->hdev, qca_baudrate);
if (ret) {
- bt_dev_err(hdev, "Failed to change the baud rate (%d)",
+ bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to change the baud rate (%d)",
ret);
return ret;
}
host_set_baudrate(hu, speed);
}
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
+{
+ struct hci_dev *hdev = hu->hdev;
+ struct qca_data *qca = hu->priv;
+ unsigned int speed, qca_baudrate = QCA_BAUDRATE_115200;
+ int ret;
+ int soc_ver = 0;
+
+ bt_dev_info(hdev, "ROME setup");
+
+ /* Patch downloading has to be done without IBS mode */
+ clear_bit(STATE_IN_BAND_SLEEP_ENABLED, &qca->flags);
+
+ /* Setup initial baudrate */
+ qca_set_init_speed(hu);
+ /* Setup user speed if needed */
+ ret = qca_set_oper_speed(hu);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ speed = qca_get_oper_speed(hu);
+ if (speed)
+ qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
nit: the sequence
qca_set_oper_speed()
qca_get_oper_speed()
is slightly awkward to read. This could be avoided if the speed was
passed as parameter, though I understand this isn't done for symmetry
with qca_set_init_speed(). An alternative could be:
static int qca_set_speed(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned int speed, enum
qca_speed_type speed_type)
{
unsigned int qca_baudrate;
if (speed_type == QCA_OPER_SPEED) {
qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
bt_dev_info(hu->hdev, "Set UART speed to %d", speed);
ret = qca_set_baudrate(hu->hdev, qca_baudrate);
if (ret) {
bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to change the baud rate (%d)",
ret);
return ret;
}
}
host_set_baudrate(hu, speed);
/* If the order doesn't matter set the host baudrate first and
return if speed_type != QCA_OPER_SPEED */
return 0;
}
static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
{
...
speed = qca_get_init_speed(hu);
if (speed)
qca_set_speed(hu, speed, QCA_INIT_SPEED);
speed = qca_get_oper_speed(hu);
if (speed) {
qca_set_speed(hu, speed, QCA_OPER_SPEED);
qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
}
...
}
Just a suggestion, ok for me if you prefer to keep it as is.
[Bala]: will study and update the same.
[Bala]: you are suggestion looks ok to me. i am thinking to optimize
further.
static unsigned int qca_get_speed(struct hci_uart *hu,
enum qca_speed_type speed_type)
{
unsigned int speed = 0;
if (speed_type == QCA_INIT_SPEED) {
if (hu->init_speed)
speed = hu->init_speed;
else if (hu->proto->init_speed)
speed = hu->proto->init_speed;
} else {
if (hu->oper_speed)
speed = hu->oper_speed;
else if (hu->proto->oper_speed)
speed = hu->proto->oper_speed;
}
return speed;
}
static int qca_set_speed(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned int speed,
enum qca_speed_type speed_type)
{
unsigned int qca_baudrate;
int ret;
if (speed_type == QCA_OPER_SPEED) {
qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
bt_dev_info(hu->hdev, "Set UART speed to %d", speed);
ret = qca_set_baudrate(hu->hdev, qca_baudrate);
if (ret) {
bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to change the
baudrate (%d)",
ret);
return ret;
}
}
host_set_baudrate(hu, speed);
return ret;
}
static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
{
...
/* Setup initial baudrate */
speed = qca_get_speed(hu, QCA_INIT_SPEED);
if (speed)
qca_set_speed(hu, speed, QCA_INIT_SPEED);
/* Setup user speed if needed */
speed = qca_get_speed(hu, QCA_OPER_SPEED);
if (speed) {
ret = qca_set_speed(hu, speed, QCA_OPER_SPEED);
if (ret)
return ret;
qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
}
}
will have two functions,
qca_set_speed(): for setting speed
qca_get_speed(): to get the speed.
is this preferable?
--
Regards
Balakrishna.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
