Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Fix "Sleep inside atomic section" warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Thierry,

> This patch fixes the following warning during boot:
> 
> do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at
> [<(ptrval)>] qca_setup+0x194/0x750 [hci_uart]
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1878 at kernel/sched/core.c:6135
> __might_sleep+0x7c/0x88
> 
> In qca_set_baudrate(), the current task state is set to
> TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE before going to sleep for 300ms. It was then
> restored to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE. This patch sets the current task state
> back to TASK_RUNNING instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> index f05382b5a65d..51790dd02afb 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> @@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static int qca_set_baudrate(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t baudrate)
> 	 */
> 	set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> 	schedule_timeout(msecs_to_jiffies(BAUDRATE_SETTLE_TIMEOUT_MS));
> -	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +	set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> 

However wouldn’t it better to use msleep or similar instead of open coding it with schedule_timeout?

Regards

Marcel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux