On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:32:04PM +0530, Manu Gautam wrote: > On 4/13/2018 11:03 PM, Jack Pham wrote: > > Are the extcon phandles bound to the glue node? I don't see the > > description in the bindings doc in PATCH 1/3. And if so, would it be > > a duplicate of the child node's extcon binding? Then again, the > > alternative would be to grab it directly from the child (i.e. > > qcom->dwc3->dev.of_node) which I'm not sure is ok to do or not. > > > > Yes these are bound to glue node. I missed to add it to documentation, will do > so. Ok thanks. > I kept it separate for couple of reasons - one is to not peek too-much into child > node. Another reason is that doing so allows to have extcon in "peripheral" > only mode as well (not just drd mode which is the case with dwc3 core). > It allows to notify h/w when vbus is not there in device mode which IMO is > right thing to do. Ah, makes sense. extcon for the child is only needed for dual-role. Jack -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
