On 04/09/2018 09:33 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2018-03-15 21:08:22)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
>> index 0a6f7952bbb1..43757a078146 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
>> @@ -297,6 +297,52 @@
>> #clock-cells = <1>;
>> };
>>
>> + rpmpd: qcom,rpmpd {
>
> power-controller? power-domain-controller? power-domains? Or something
> like that.
>
>> + compatible = "qcom,rpmpd-msm8996";
>> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>> + operating-points-v2 = <&rpmpd_opp_table>, /* cx */
>> + <&rpmpd_opp_table>, /* cx_ao */
>> + <&rpmpd_opp_table>, /* cx_vfc */
>> + <&rpmpd_opp_table>, /* mx */
>> + <&rpmpd_opp_table>, /* mx_ao */
>> + <&rpmpd_opp_table>, /* sscx */
>> + <&rpmpd_opp_table>; /* sscx_vfc */
>> + };
>> +
>> + rpmpd_opp_table: opp-table {
>
> This should go into the root of the tree? Otherwise it may be populated
> by the RPMh platform populate code which would be odd. We should go and
> update the platform populate code to always ignore operating-points-v2
> compatible nodes too.
>
>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2", "operating-points-v2-qcom";
>
> This is backwards? I thought more specific compatible went first.
thanks for the review, will fixup all of these when I respin.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
