Hello Mark, On 03/20/2018 07:43 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 06:09:11PM -0700, David Collins wrote: >> Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some >> Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs. These devices allow a given > > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This > makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches. Looking through the DT binding patches sent to devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, it seemed like the preferred style is: [PATCH] dt-bindings: subsystem: ... I can change the subject line for this patch to be: "[PATCH 2/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings" if you prefer. >> +========================================= >> +Second Level Nodes - Regulators >> +========================================= >> + >> +- regulator-name > > This document appears to be reproducing the standard regulator bindings; > there is no need to do that, just reference them. Sure, I'll remove this. Thanks, David -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
