On 02/07/2018 03:25 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..02520f19e4ca >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi >> @@ -0,0 +1,277 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. >> + */ >> + >> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> >> + >> +/ { >> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SDM845"; > > I'm fairly certain that "model" doesn't belong in the SoC .dtsi file. > Only in the board .dts file. > > >> + clocks { >> + xo_board: xo_board { > > Just to make it explicit: see my comments in patch 3/3 in this series > about using "_" in node names. I believe this should be: > > xo_board: xo-board { > > >> + spmi_bus: qcom,spmi@c440000 { > > Drop the qcom in the node name. AKA, I believe this should be: > > spmi_bus: spmi@c440000 { > > Specifically the node name is supposed to be a generic component name > then with an address. I see that Rob Herring said the same thing when > he reviewed v1 of this patch just now (it seems like people are still > commenting there, so make sure you collect the latest feedback from > there when re-spinning). yes, I'll make sure I fix up based on Robs' review of the v1. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html