Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add minimal dts/dtsi files for sdm845 SoC and MTP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[]..

>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +       model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SDM845";
> 
> This should only be in the board level file.

thanks, will fix.

> 
>> +
>> +       interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> +
>> +       #address-cells = <2>;
>> +       #size-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> +       chosen { };
>> +
>> +       memory {
>> +               device_type = "memory";
>> +               /* We expect the bootloader to fill in the reg */
> 
> The start address is variable? If not you should populate the base and
> have a unit-address.

sure, I'll check and update.

> 
>> +               reg = <0 0 0 0>;
>> +       };
>> +

[]..
>> +
>> +       soc: soc {
>> +               #address-cells = <1>;
>> +               #size-cells = <1>;
>> +               ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
>> +               compatible = "simple-bus";
>> +
>> +               intc: interrupt-controller@17a00000 {
>> +                       compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
>> +                       #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> +                       interrupt-controller;
>> +                       #redistributor-regions = <1>;
>> +                       redistributor-stride = <0x0 0x20000>;
>> +                       reg = <0x17a00000 0x10000>,     /* GICD */
>> +                             <0x17a60000 0x100000>;    /* GICR * 8 */
>> +                       interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +               };
>> +
>> +               gcc: clock-controller@100000 {
>> +                       compatible = "qcom,gcc-sdm845";
> 
> sdm845-gcc is the preferred order.

This is still proposed as part of the GCC patch for sdm845 [1]
(which looks like has neither you nor the DT list copied :/ )
Also looking at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt,
I see we seem to follow the gcc-<soc> convention for compatible all along :(

                        "qcom,gcc-apq8064"
                        "qcom,gcc-apq8084"
                        "qcom,gcc-ipq8064"
                        "qcom,gcc-ipq4019"
                        "qcom,gcc-ipq8074"
                        "qcom,gcc-msm8660"
                        "qcom,gcc-msm8916"
                        "qcom,gcc-msm8960"
                        "qcom,gcc-msm8974"
                        "qcom,gcc-msm8974pro"
                        "qcom,gcc-msm8974pro-ac"
                        "qcom,gcc-msm8994"
                        "qcom,gcc-msm8996"
                        "qcom,gcc-mdm9615"

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10193895/ 

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux