On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 12/21/2017 2:48 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:55:33AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>>> Hi Viresh,
>>>
>>> On 12/20/2017 8:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>>> On 19-12-17, 21:25, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>>> + cpu@0 {
>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,krait";
>>>>> + enable-method = "qcom,kpss-acc-v1";
>>>>> + device_type = "cpu";
>>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>>> + qcom,acc = <&acc0>;
>>>>> + qcom,saw = <&saw0>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&kraitcc 0>;
>>>>> + clock-names = "cpu";
>>>>> + cpu-supply = <&smb208_s2a>;
>>>>> + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + qcom,pvs {
>>>>> + qcom,pvs-format-a;
>>>>> + };
>>>>
>>>> Not sure what Rob is going to say on that :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. Would be good to know the best way.
>>
>> Seems like this should be a property of an efuse node either implied by
>> the compatible or a separate property. What determines format A vs. B?
>>
>
> Yes, this efuse registers are part of the eeprom (qfprom) tied to the soc.
> So this property (details like bitfields and register offsets that it represents)
> can be put soc specific and nvmem apis can be used to read
> the registers. Does something like below look ok ?
>
> qcom,pvs {
> compatible = "qcom,pvs-ipq8064";
> nvmem-cells = <&pvs_efuse>;
> }
Why do you need this node? It doesn't look like it corresponds to a
h/w block. It looks like you are just creating it to instantiate a
driver.
> qfprom: qfprom@700000 {
> compatible = "qcom,qfprom";
Either this or...
> reg = <0x00700000 0x1000>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> ranges;
> pvs_efuse: pvs {
a compatible here should be specific enough so the OS can know what
the bits are.
> reg = <0xc0 0x8>;
> };
> };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
