On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:55:33AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On 12/20/2017 8:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 19-12-17, 21:25, Sricharan R wrote:
> >> + cpu@0 {
> >> + compatible = "qcom,krait";
> >> + enable-method = "qcom,kpss-acc-v1";
> >> + device_type = "cpu";
> >> + reg = <0>;
> >> + qcom,acc = <&acc0>;
> >> + qcom,saw = <&saw0>;
> >> + clocks = <&kraitcc 0>;
> >> + clock-names = "cpu";
> >> + cpu-supply = <&smb208_s2a>;
> >> + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + qcom,pvs {
> >> + qcom,pvs-format-a;
> >> + };
> >
> > Not sure what Rob is going to say on that :)
> >
>
> Yes. Would be good to know the best way.
Seems like this should be a property of an efuse node either implied by
the compatible or a separate property. What determines format A vs. B?
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
