On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/13/2017 03:49 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> >> >> From what I have understood Qualcomm has one finger constantly >> on the fast-forward button for upstreaming right now, which I think >> is good (everyone should have!) but the limited number of trusted >> maintainers of core infrastructure code makes bottlenecks form >> around these drivers where review is really needed and deep queues >> of patches form. Sorry. > > > That's one of the reasons why I prefer v5 of my patch instead of v7. v5 > does not touch the core. It's much less intrusive and has no risk of > breaking other drivers. I can't say that about v7. The more intrusive design is on my request so I will look at it in detail ASAP. I took a quick look and liked what I saw, I just need to make sure about the details. Also it'd be nice to have a nod from Björn. The main reason for some of the work is ACPI, am I right? Timur could you look quickly at the series posted by Andy Shevchenko (6 patches prefixed gpiolib: acpi: ) for augmenting ACPI GPIOs in the core? Especially patch 5 and 6 which introduce the ability to add quirks in the core. I'd like to get some ARM-based people to look at it to make sure we those systems can also quirk their GPIOs if need be. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
