On 07/30, Abhishek Sahu wrote: > On 2017-07-29 00:03, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >On 07/27, Abhishek Sahu wrote: > >>diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c > >>b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c > >>index 47a1da3..e6cde2d 100644 > >>--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c > >>+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c > >>@@ -118,7 +118,10 @@ void clk_alpha_pll_configure(struct > >>clk_alpha_pll *pll, struct regmap *regmap, > >> regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_L_VAL, config->l); > >> regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_ALPHA_VAL, config->alpha); > >> regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_CONFIG_CTL, config->config_ctl_val); > >>- regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_CONFIG_CTL_U, > >>config->config_ctl_hi_val); > >>+ > >>+ if (pll->flags & SUPPORTS_64BIT_CONFIG_CTL) > >>+ regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_CONFIG_CTL_U, > >>+ config->config_ctl_hi_val); > > > >Is there a hole there? I mean a RAZ/WI register so we can just > >keep writing it and not care? > > We don't have hole for most of the alpha PLL. The offset for > CONFIG_CTL itself is not same for all types of Alpha PLL > and the same is being handled in patch 4 of this patch > series. > > Spark PLL > CONFIG_CTL 0x18 > TEST_CTL 0x1C > TEST_CTL_U 0x20 > > Brammo PLL > CONFIG_CTL 0x18 > TEST_CTL 0x1C > PLL_STATUS 0x24 > > Hyuara PLL > CONFIG_CTL 0x14 > CONFIG_CTL_U 0x18 > TEST_CTL 0x1c Ok. Thanks for checking. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
