Hi,
On 07/19/2017 02:59 PM, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
Stan,
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:12:45AM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
Hi,
On 07/19/2017 09:49 AM, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:44:38AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Tue 18 Jul 02:58 PDT 2017, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:07:18PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 17 Jul 05:04 PDT 2017, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
[..]
Can you confirm that this is actually version 4 of this block? Or are we
just incrementing an arbitrary number here?
This is not exactly the 4th version of the block. However, it is
a different version than the ones that are already supported in
this driver. Since the existing driver didn't exactly tie it with
the block IP version, I too followed the same versioning
convention.
Do you have a block IP version that you could base your numbering on, to
break the trend? (We should go back and fix up the others as well)
Presently, the driver supports the ipq8064, apq8064, apq8084,
msm8996, ipq4019 and ipq8074. The SoCs, qcom_pcie_ops version and
the block IP versions are as follows.
ipq8064 - v0 - 2.1.0
apq8064 - v0 - 2.1.0
apq8084 - v1 - 1.0.0
msm8996 - v2 - 2.3.2
ipq4019 - v3 - 2.4.0
ipq8074 - v4 - 2.3.3
That's nice, but I think we need the Synopsys IP versions too, can you
provide such an information and after that we can decide how the names
should look like.
Sorry, I posted v2 before I saw this e-mail. Will post v3 based
on what naming style is decided.
The SoCs, qcom_pcie_ops version, the block IP version and
Synopsys IP versions are as follows.
ipq8064 - v0 - 2.1.0 - 4.01a
apq8064 - v0 - 2.1.0 - 4.01a
apq8084 - v1 - 1.0.0 - 4.11a
msm8996 - v2 - 2.3.2 - 4.21a
ipq4019 - v3 - 2.4.0 - 4.20a
ipq8074 - v4 - 2.3.3 - 4.30a
I would have loved to say the dwc IP versions sounds better, but
this is the qcom wrapper over dwc. So, for me it makes more sense
to have qcom specific IP version names.
Can we have couple or more versions of qcom pcie IPs based on
same dwc IP version? I have not looked closely, but in that case
too using qcom nomenclature would again make more sense.
Thanks
Vivek
Thanks
Varada
I will rename the qcom_pcie_ops structure and related functions
with the block IP version instead of vX numbering and post the
patch.
regards,
Stan
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
