On 07/18, Kiran Gunda wrote: > v4: > * spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5 > Clean-up as per Stephen's comments > > v3: > * spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5 > Modified #define INVALID (-1) to > #define INVALID_EE 0xFF. > > v2: > * spmi: pmic-arb: return __iomem pointer instead of offset > Added Stephen's reviewed-by tag. > > * spmi: pmic-arb: fix a possible null pointer dereference > Added Stephen's reviewed-by tag. > > * spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5 > Modified the pmic_arb_offset_v5 function to return the offset instead > of passed by a pointer. > > * spmi: pmic-arb: Remove checking opc value not less than 0 > Added Stephen's reviewed-by tag. > Added my sign-off tag. > > v1: > > This patch series add the support for pmic arbiter hardware v5 along with > the few bug fixes and code cleanup. > > This patch series is dependent on the below patches and can be merged > cleanly only after picking the below patches in to the tree. Can you combine the two series? It's really confusing why there are two patch series from you for the same driver. Presumably one of the series needs to be applied before the other, so putting them into one series makes that clear what the order is. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
