On 2017-07-14 23:50, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/10, Kiran Gunda wrote:
-static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pa, u16 ppid)
+static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16
ppid)
{
+ struct apid_data *apid_info =
&pmic_arb->apid_data[pmic_arb->last_apid];
u32 regval, offset;
- u16 apid;
- u16 id;
+ u16 id, i;
/*
- * PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL is a table in HW mapping channel to ppid.
+ * PMIC_ARB_REG_APID is a table in HW mapping apid to ppid.
* ppid_to_apid is an in-memory invert of that table.
*/
- for (apid = pa->last_apid; ; apid++) {
- offset = PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL(apid);
- if (offset >= pa->core_size)
+ for (i = pmic_arb->last_apid; ; i++, apid_info++) {
Can we keep apid instead of replacing it with i please? That will
reduce the noise in this function.
Sure. Will do that in the next patch.
+ offset = PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL(i);
+ if (offset >= pmic_arb->core_size)
break;
- regval = readl_relaxed(pa->cnfg +
- SPMI_OWNERSHIP_TABLE_REG(apid));
- pa->apid_data[apid].owner = SPMI_OWNERSHIP_PERIPH2OWNER(regval);
+ regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->cnfg +
+ SPMI_OWNERSHIP_TABLE_REG(i));
+ apid_info->owner = SPMI_OWNERSHIP_PERIPH2OWNER(regval);
- regval = readl_relaxed(pa->core + offset);
+ regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->core + offset);
if (!regval)
continue;
id = (regval >> 8) & PMIC_ARB_PPID_MASK;
- pa->ppid_to_apid[id] = apid | PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID;
- pa->apid_data[apid].ppid = id;
+ pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[id] = i | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ apid_info->ppid = id;
if (id == ppid) {
- apid |= PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID;
+ i |= PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
break;
}
}
- pa->last_apid = apid & ~PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID;
+ pmic_arb->last_apid = i & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
- return apid;
+ return i;
}
Otherwise patch looks ok.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
