On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 04:16:23PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 7/11/2017 3:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > I'm trying to avoid pci_walk_bus() because it's such a minefield as > > far as hot-added devices. I don't think we can avoid one in the > > quirk, to turn off extended tags for any devices we've already found, > > but I think we *can* avoid adding more i > > Jike Song asked what if you attach a PCIe endpoint that has an extended > tags quirk to think about the reverse direction. That's why, I was walking > the entire bus. My proposal handles endpoints, too. The pci_walk_bus() in the quirk handles all devices we've already enumerated, and all devices we'll enumerate in the future are handled in pci_configure_device(). > We can maybe hold onto putting such a generic code until such a device > with quirk actually shows up. > > I'll pull your suggestion into a patch, give it a try and then post the > next version. > > -- > Sinan Kaya > Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. > Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
