Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] dt-bindings: Interconnect device-tree bindings draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rob,

On 06/30/2017 12:32 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 08:49:03PM +0300, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> The interconnect API is not yet using DT bindings for expressing
>> the relations between the API consumers and providers. This is
>> posted a separate patch as it needs further discussions on how
>> to represent this with DT.
> 
> I would recommend continuing to sort out how this works within the 
> kernel before fixing things in DT. Something like this needs to be a 
> core binding in the DT spec.

Yes, that's the plan. Do you prefer me to drop this patch for now?

> 
> Also, you should CC some ARM, Ltd. folks like Mark R and Lorenzo. 
> There's been some discussion in the past how to describe the DMA master 
> side of the bus topology.

Thanks for the information! I will CC them on the next version!

BR,
Georgi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux