On 1/20/2017 11:45 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Fri 20 Jan 08:10 PST 2017, Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
Add smp2p support to communicate with slpi processor.
Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi <akdwived@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
index 9d1d7ad..c60472b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
@@ -541,5 +541,29 @@
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
};
};
+
+ smp2p-slpi {
+ compatible = "qcom,smp2p";
+ qcom,smem = <481>, <430>;
+
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 178 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+
+ qcom,ipc = <&apcs 16 26>;
+
+ qcom,local-pid = <0>;
+ qcom,remote-pid = <3>;
+
+ slpi_smp2p_in: slave-kernel {
+ qcom,entry-name = "slave-kernel";
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ };
+
+ slpi_smp2p_out: master-kernel {
+ qcom,entry-name = "master-kernel";
+ #qcom,state-cells = <1>;
Sorry for missing this earlier, but this is "#qcom,smem-state-cells" in
mainline
OK thanks for pointing this, may i know if it doesn't find proper "qcom,
smem-state-cells" entry for smem-state is their any fallback option or
smem set/reset will not reflect at all at remoteproc?
Apart of that:
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Bjorn
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
