Re: [RESEND PATCHv1 0/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: Provide support for enhanced strobe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/20/2017 2:23 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 10 January 2017 at 08:00, Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

Resending this patch series, as no one could review it -possibly due to
holidays during that time.

This patch series mainly provides enhanced strobe support to sdhci-msm driver
along with some additions of HW recommended sequence. This has been tested on
8996 based internal target & on db410c.

Patches 1-3 :- Factors out few functions to be re-used again.
               To also simplify large functions and makes it more readable.

Patches 4-5 :- Few recommendations based on HW prog. guide.

Patches 6 :- Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after platform_execute_tuning
             so that ->platform_execute_tuning (underlying platform driver) can
             know about HS400 tuning.

Patch 7 :- Implements an additional step as per HPG for HS400 tuning.

Patch 8 :- Implements enhanced strobe functionality in sdhci-msm driver.


Ritesh Harjani (6):
  mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out sdhci_msm_hc_select_mode
  mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out function to set/get msm clock rate
  mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out sdhci_msm_hs400
  mmc: sdhci: Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after
    platform_execute_tuning
  mmc: sdhci-msm: Make HS400 tuning follow as per recommeneded HW
    sequence
  mmc: sdhci-msm: Provide enhanced_strobe mode feature support

Subhash Jadavani (1):
  mmc: sdhci-msm: configure CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG to recommended value

Venkat Gopalakrishnan (1):
  mmc: sdhci-msm: Reset vendor specific func register on probe

 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 356 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c     |   6 +-
 2 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.


Ritesh, Adrian,

I realized that Adrian requested a minor fixup of patch6. However to
simplify a bit for all of us, avoiding another new version of the
series being sent I decided to pick this series as is.
Thanks Ulf.


Adrian, I even took the liberty of adding your ack for patch6. I also
trust Ritesh to make a fix for patch6, but on top of the series I have
just applied.
Thanks :)



If you have any objections, please tell me!
No objections as such. But I wanted to clear few things here.

Based on Adrian comments for patch6 - I think since anyway I will hook sdhci-msm to host->mmc_host_ops.execute_tuning (which will call ->sdhci_msm_execute_tuning directly and play with SDHCI_HS400_TUNING inside sdhci_msm_execute_tuning function), I assumed we need to drop path6 (which plays with SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag inside sdhci_execute_tuning).


@Adrian,
Please let me know if we would anyway like to retain patch6. If yes, I can make the changes you mentioned for sdhci-msm on top of this patch series.

If not, then instead of reverting path6 again on top of this series, I will re-submit a new series with your comments addressed and dropping patch6.

Please let me know what suits better.

Regards
Ritesh


Kind regards
Uffe


--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux