On 1/20/2017 2:23 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 10 January 2017 at 08:00, Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Resending this patch series, as no one could review it -possibly due to
holidays during that time.
This patch series mainly provides enhanced strobe support to sdhci-msm driver
along with some additions of HW recommended sequence. This has been tested on
8996 based internal target & on db410c.
Patches 1-3 :- Factors out few functions to be re-used again.
To also simplify large functions and makes it more readable.
Patches 4-5 :- Few recommendations based on HW prog. guide.
Patches 6 :- Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after platform_execute_tuning
so that ->platform_execute_tuning (underlying platform driver) can
know about HS400 tuning.
Patch 7 :- Implements an additional step as per HPG for HS400 tuning.
Patch 8 :- Implements enhanced strobe functionality in sdhci-msm driver.
Ritesh Harjani (6):
mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out sdhci_msm_hc_select_mode
mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out function to set/get msm clock rate
mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out sdhci_msm_hs400
mmc: sdhci: Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after
platform_execute_tuning
mmc: sdhci-msm: Make HS400 tuning follow as per recommeneded HW
sequence
mmc: sdhci-msm: Provide enhanced_strobe mode feature support
Subhash Jadavani (1):
mmc: sdhci-msm: configure CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG to recommended value
Venkat Gopalakrishnan (1):
mmc: sdhci-msm: Reset vendor specific func register on probe
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 356 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 6 +-
2 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Ritesh, Adrian,
I realized that Adrian requested a minor fixup of patch6. However to
simplify a bit for all of us, avoiding another new version of the
series being sent I decided to pick this series as is.
Thanks Ulf.
Adrian, I even took the liberty of adding your ack for patch6. I also
trust Ritesh to make a fix for patch6, but on top of the series I have
just applied.
Thanks :)
If you have any objections, please tell me!
No objections as such. But I wanted to clear few things here.
Based on Adrian comments for patch6 - I think since anyway I will hook
sdhci-msm to host->mmc_host_ops.execute_tuning (which will call
->sdhci_msm_execute_tuning directly and play with SDHCI_HS400_TUNING
inside sdhci_msm_execute_tuning function), I assumed we need to drop
path6 (which plays with SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag inside
sdhci_execute_tuning).
@Adrian,
Please let me know if we would anyway like to retain patch6. If yes, I
can make the changes you mentioned for sdhci-msm on top of this patch
series.
If not, then instead of reverting path6 again on top of this series, I
will re-submit a new series with your comments addressed and dropping
patch6.
Please let me know what suits better.
Regards
Ritesh
Kind regards
Uffe
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
