Re: [PATCH V5 08/12] iommu/arm-smmu: Clean up early-probing workarounds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/01/17 16:50, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:35:52PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> Now that the appropriate ordering is enforced via profe-deferral of
>> masters in core code, rip it all out and bask in the simplicity.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
>> [Sricharan: Rebased on top of ACPI IORT SMMU series]
>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  * No change
> 
> Well, a tad too early on the series for ACPI, aka if we bisect the
> series here you would break ACPI.
> 
> Totally agree on the patch, but you should move it to the end of the
> series.

Indeed - I think a more appropriate ordering of the current patch
numbers would be:

1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 5+10 (squashed), 6, 11, 7, 8, 12

Robin.

> 
> Lorenzo
> 
>>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 46 ++---------------------------------
>>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c    | 58 +++++++--------------------------------------
>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> index 7d45d8b..7fc4e5f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> @@ -2724,51 +2724,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	.probe	= arm_smmu_device_probe,
>>  	.remove	= arm_smmu_device_remove,
>>  };
>> +module_platform_driver(arm_smmu_driver);
>>  
>> -static int __init arm_smmu_init(void)
>> -{
>> -	static bool registered;
>> -	int ret = 0;
>> -
>> -	if (!registered) {
>> -		ret = platform_driver_register(&arm_smmu_driver);
>> -		registered = !ret;
>> -	}
>> -	return ret;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void __exit arm_smmu_exit(void)
>> -{
>> -	return platform_driver_unregister(&arm_smmu_driver);
>> -}
>> -
>> -subsys_initcall(arm_smmu_init);
>> -module_exit(arm_smmu_exit);
>> -
>> -static int __init arm_smmu_of_init(struct device_node *np)
>> -{
>> -	int ret = arm_smmu_init();
>> -
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> -
>> -	if (!of_platform_device_create(np, NULL, platform_bus_type.dev_root))
>> -		return -ENODEV;
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>> -}
>> -IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv3, "arm,smmu-v3", arm_smmu_of_init);
>> -
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> -static int __init acpi_smmu_v3_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
>> -{
>> -	if (iort_node_match(ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3))
>> -		return arm_smmu_init();
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>> -}
>> -IORT_ACPI_DECLARE(arm_smmu_v3, ACPI_SIG_IORT, acpi_smmu_v3_init);
>> -#endif
>> +IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv3, "arm,smmu-v3", NULL);
>>  
>>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IOMMU API for ARM architected SMMUv3 implementations");
>>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>");
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> index 73a0a25..c86ae5f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> @@ -2134,56 +2134,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	.probe	= arm_smmu_device_probe,
>>  	.remove	= arm_smmu_device_remove,
>>  };
>> -
>> -static int __init arm_smmu_init(void)
>> -{
>> -	static bool registered;
>> -	int ret = 0;
>> -
>> -	if (!registered) {
>> -		ret = platform_driver_register(&arm_smmu_driver);
>> -		registered = !ret;
>> -	}
>> -	return ret;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void __exit arm_smmu_exit(void)
>> -{
>> -	return platform_driver_unregister(&arm_smmu_driver);
>> -}
>> -
>> -subsys_initcall(arm_smmu_init);
>> -module_exit(arm_smmu_exit);
>> -
>> -static int __init arm_smmu_of_init(struct device_node *np)
>> -{
>> -	int ret = arm_smmu_init();
>> -
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> -
>> -	if (!of_platform_device_create(np, NULL, platform_bus_type.dev_root))
>> -		return -ENODEV;
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>> -}
>> -IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv1, "arm,smmu-v1", arm_smmu_of_init);
>> -IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv2, "arm,smmu-v2", arm_smmu_of_init);
>> -IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu400, "arm,mmu-400", arm_smmu_of_init);
>> -IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu401, "arm,mmu-401", arm_smmu_of_init);
>> -IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu500, "arm,mmu-500", arm_smmu_of_init);
>> -IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(cavium_smmuv2, "cavium,smmu-v2", arm_smmu_of_init);
>> -
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> -static int __init arm_smmu_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
>> -{
>> -	if (iort_node_match(ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU))
>> -		return arm_smmu_init();
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>> -}
>> -IORT_ACPI_DECLARE(arm_smmu, ACPI_SIG_IORT, arm_smmu_acpi_init);
>> -#endif
>> +module_platform_driver(arm_smmu_driver);
>> +
>> +IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv1, "arm,smmu-v1", NULL);
>> +IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv2, "arm,smmu-v2", NULL);
>> +IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu400, "arm,mmu-400", NULL);
>> +IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu401, "arm,mmu-401", NULL);
>> +IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu500, "arm,mmu-500", NULL);
>> +IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(cavium_smmuv2, "cavium,smmu-v2", NULL);
>>  
>>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IOMMU API for ARM architected SMMU implementations");
>>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>");
>> -- 
>> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux