On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So this isn't how I planned on announcing it, but hey, I'm back. > >> Rob Clark (5): >> drm/msm: extend the submit ioctl to pass in flags > > Renaming 'pipe' to 'flags' would break backwards compatibility - I'm not big > fan of 'pipe' either but I would strongly recommend keeping it just to keep > everybody happy. I know that you bump the API version a couple of changes > later and we could use that as a stop gap but workarounds suck. well.. it doesn't break *ABI* compat, and the upstream user (libdrm) carries it's own copy of the header in sync with the name change. As far as I know this is all we care about. Any other "hypothetical" userspace should just carry it's own copy of the kernel header, IMHO. >> drm/msm: submit support for in-fences >> drm/msm: move fence allocation out of msm_gpu_submit() >> drm/msm: submit support for out-fences >> drm/msm: bump kernel api version for explicit fencing > > You misspelled ioctl in the comment. :) oh, whoops.. well if dave hasn't merged my pull req yet I can fixup the typo and resend the pr. Unfortunately kbuild robot doesn't include spellcheck ;-) BR, -R > Regards, > Jordan > > -- > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
